Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-826 - Allah v. Karandy et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-826 - Allah v. Karandy et al
July 30, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERS that, as a result of the Court's sua sponte reconsideration of that portion of the July 2014 Order that states that the Clerk of the Court shall forward summonses, along with copies of the complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon Defendants Khan, Hilton, and VanBuren, see July 2014 Order at 31, the aforesaid portion of the July 2014 Order is amended as set forth below; and the Court further ORDERS that, upon Plaintiff's submission of a renewed IFP Application or request for assistance with service of process, the Clerk of the Court shall return the file to the Court for further consideration; and the Court further ORDERS that, if Plaintiff does not submit an IFP Application or a request for assistance with service of process within twenty (20) days of the filing date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, the Clerk of the Court shall forward the summonses to Plaintiff, who shall be responsible for effecting service of process on Defendants Hilton, Khan, and VanBuren; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum- Decision and Order on Plaintiff, together with a blank In Forma Pauperis Application. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 7/30/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail with a blank In Forma Pauperis Application)
May 9, 2016
PDF | More
iff's Eighth Amendment claims and GRANTED to Defendants Hilton and Van Buren on Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims related to imposition of restraints and the jumpsuit; and 2. Summary judgment be DENIED to Defendants HiltonORDER and REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 54) be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: 1. Summary judgment be GRANTED to Defendants Khan, Hilton and Van Buren on Plaint and Van Buren on Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims related to Draft Directive No. 4939. ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 64) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 5/9/16. ( Objections to R&R due by 5/26/2016, Case Review Deadline 5/31/2016) {r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Dancks' May 9, 2016 Order and Report-Recommendation, see Dkt. No. 65, is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 54, is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Khan, Hilton, and Van Buren. ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 54, is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Defendants Hilton and Van Buren insofar as those claims relate to imposition of restraints and the jumpsuit. ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 54, is DENIED with regard to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Defendants Hilton and Van Buren insofar as those claims relate to Draft Directive No. 4939. ORDERS that this case is now trial ready and the Court will issue a trial order in due course. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 3/31/17.{order and consent form served via regular mail on plaintiff} (nas)