Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-939 - Brandon v. Schroyer et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-939 - Brandon v. Schroyer et al
February 26, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that defendant Schroyer's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 75) be GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claims against him, with the exception of plaintiff's retaliation claim and that the motion be DENIED as to that claim. RECOMMENDED that the motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Bedard, Blaise, Clancy, Laurin, Kinter, Perry, Web, and Wingler (Dkt. No. 77) be GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claims asserted against all defendants, with the exception of plaintiff's failure-to-protect claim asserted against defendants Blaise and Clancy and that the motion be DENIED as to that claim. RECOMMENDED that defendant Schroyer be permitted to file a second motion for summary judgment addressing the retaliation claim not addressed in his first motion, and that defendants Blaise and Clancy be permitted to file a second motion for summary judgment addressing the failure-to-protect claim not addressed in their first motion. Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2016 Case Review Deadline 3/18/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 2/26/16. {r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
April 25, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Plaintiff's objections to the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Peebles, dkt. #111, are hereby OVERRULED. The Report-Recommendation, dkt. #99, is hereby ADOPTED. ORDERED, that defendant Schroyer's motion for summary judgment, dkt. #75, is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff's retaliation claims against Plaintiff and GRANTED in all other respects. ORDERED, that defendant Schroyer's second motion for summary judgment is hereby accepted as filed. The Clerk of Court shall refer the motion to Magistrate Judge Peebles for a Report and Recommendation. ORDERED, that the motion of summary judgment of Defendants Bedard, Blaise, Clancy, Laurin, Kinter, Perry, Web and Wingler, dkt. #77, is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's failure-to-protect claim against Defendants Blaise and Clancy and GRANTED in all other respects. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 4/25/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
July 13, 2016
PDF | More
/1/2016 Case Review Deadline 8/3/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 7/13/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that defendant Schroyer's second motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 100) be GRANTED, and that plaintiff's remaining retaliation claim asserted against him be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 8
February 28, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that defendants' motion for summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 122) be GRANTED, and that plaintiff's remaining claims in this action against defendants Blaise and Clancy be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 3/17/2017 Case Review Deadline 3/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 2/28/17. {r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed herein, the Court accepts and adopts Magistrate Judge Peebles's July 13, 2016 Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 136. Accordingly, defendant Schroyer's second motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 100) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's remaining retaliation claim asserted against defendant Schroyer is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/21/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
March 23, 2017
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed above, the Court accepts and adopts Magistrate Judge Peebles's February 28, 2017 Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 159. Accordingly, defendants Eric Blaise and Margaret Clancy's second motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 122) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's remaining failure to protect claim asserted against these defendants is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/23/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
March 23, 2017
PDF | More
JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Decision and Order of the Honorable Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy, dated the 23rd day of March, 2017. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )