Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-115 - Galberth v. Durkin, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-115 - Galberth v. Durkin, et al
December 8, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER and REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED, that defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 30) be GRANTED only to the extent that plaintiff bases his claims on the Fourteenth Amendment. RECOMMENDED, that the defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 30) be DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to respond to the defendants' motion (Dkt. No. 38) is DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 12/26/2014, Case Review Deadline 12/29/2014. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 12/8/14. {r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
December 31, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER adopting 39 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 12/31/14. (rjb, )
April 21, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER and REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED, that defendants' partial summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 69) be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL. ORDERED, that plaintiff's request to amend his complaint and/or consolidate proceedings (Dkt. No. 74) is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 5/9/2016 Case Review Deadline 5/12/2016. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 4/21/16. {r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
July 14, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER adopting 76 Report and Recommendations with respect to the availability of administrative remedies; dismissing 69 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice to renewal. The dispositive motion filing deadline is extended to 8/15/2016. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 7/14/16 (served on plaintiff via regular mail). (rjb, )
August 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER AND REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion for additional time to file supplemental exhibits (Dkt. No. 123) is DENIED. RECOMMENDED, that defendants motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 91) be GRANTED only with respect to the excessive force claims as against defendants Russell, Barnes, Hamelin, Tuller, Sears, Bisso, and Durkin in connection with the November 5, 2011 use of force. RECOMMENDED, that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 91) be DENIED in all other respects. ( Objections to R&R due by 9/18/2017, Case Review Deadline 9/21/2017). Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 8/31/17. {r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
September 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER adopting 128 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 91 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Russell, Barnes, Hamelin, Tuller, and Durkin are DISMISSED as Defendants from this action. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/27/17. (Copy served on plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )
January 12, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER that Plaintiff's excessive force claims relating to the May 2011 incidents and the November 7, 2011 incident are DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and the 1 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 1/12/18. (Copy served on Plaintiff via regular mail)(rjb, )