Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 
About FDsys
Search Government Publications
Browse Government Publications
FDsys Tutorials and Webinars
  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
Actions
 

14-201 - Gomez v. Graham et al

Download Files
Descriptive Metadata MODS
Authenticity Metadata PREMIS
All Format & Metadata Files ZIP file
Metadata
CategoryMouse over help for Category says The category to which the collection belongs. Search field operator example is category:"Judicial Publications".Judicial Publications
CollectionMouse over help for Collection says The collection to which the document belongs. Typically the same as the publication or series. Search field operator example is collection:uscourts. United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc Class NumberMouse over help for SuDoc Class Number says The SuDoc class number from the U.S. Superintendent of Documents which classifies Government publications by publishing agency. Search field operator example is sudocclass:"JU 4.15:".JU 4.15
Court TypeMouse over help for Court Type says The type of court, such as appellate, district, or bankruptcy. Search field operator example is courttype:district.District
Court NameMouse over help for Court Name says The name of the court. Search field operator example is courtname:"United States District Court District of Maryland".United States District Court Northern District of New York
CircuitMouse over help for Circuit says There are currently 11 circuits, plus the D.C. and Federal circuits. Search field operator example is circuit:4th. 2nd
Office LocationMouse over help for Office Location says The city where the office is located. Search field operator example is officelocation:Baltimore.Prisoner
Case TypeMouse over help for Case Type says District cases can either be criminal or civil. Search field operator example is casetype:criminal. civil
Nature of SuitMouse over help for Nature of Suit says The nature of the suit for appellate or district cases. Search field operator example is naturesuit:foreclosure. The CIT uses statutory references to 28 U.S.C. 1581-1584 in lieu of nature of suit codes. Search field operator example is naturesuit:antidumping.Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
CauseMouse over help for Cause says The cause in a district court case. Search field operator example is cause:"Right to Privacy Act".42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Party NamesMouse over help for Party Names says The names of the parties in the case. Search field operator example is partyname:"State of Rhode Island".Borden, Defendant
Fletcher, Defendant
Harold D. Graham, Defendant
Hahn, Defendant
D. Murray, Defendant
Neale, Defendant
J. Wright, Defendant
Santiago Gomez, Plaintiff
Document in Context
14-201 - Gomez v. Graham et al
More
October 2, 2014
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that plaintiff's 14 Second Amended Complaint is RECOMMENDED to be accepted for filing, and that the newly named defendants in the second amended complaint be added to the court's docket sheet; RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's first, third, and seventh causes of action be DISMISSED without prejudice, leaving intact plaintiff's retaliation claim (Count II) against defendants Murray, Wright, Borden, Neale, Fletcher, and Hahn; excessive force claim (Count IV) against defendants Borden, Neale, Fletcher, and Hahn; conditions of confinement claim (Count V) against defendants Murray, Wright, Hahn, and Graham; and failure to intervene claim (VI) against defendant Hahn; RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction be DENIED as moot; RECOMMENDED that, upon adoption of this report and recommendation, the clerk be directed to issue summonses and forward them, along with copies of the second amended complaint, to the USMS for service upon the named defendants. Objections to R&R due by 10/20/2014. Case Review Deadline 10/23/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 10/2/2014. (Served plaintiff by regular mail on 10/3/2014). (sal)
October 29, 2014
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: The Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. ORDERED, that plaintiff's second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 14) is accepted for filing, and the Clerk add the newly named defendants in the second amended complaint to the docket sheet. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's first, third, and seventh causes of action are DISMISSED without prejudice, leaving intact plaintiff's retaliation claim (Count II) 1 against defendants Murray, Wright, Borden, Neale, Fletcher, and Hahn; excessive force claim (Count IV) against defendants Borden, Neale, Fletcher, and Hahn; conditions of confinement claim (Count V) against defendants Murray, Wright, Hahn, and Graham; and failure to intervene claim (Count VI) against defendant Hahn. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED as moot. ORDERED, that the Clerk is directed to issue summonses and forward them, along with copies of the complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon the named defendants. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/29/14. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
October 16, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that with respect to any of the requests that are granted as described herein, defendants shall produce the requested documents or information within twenty-one days from the date of this order. ORDERED, that except as to the extent indicated above, plaintiff's 65 Motion to compel discovery is DENIED. ORDERED, that no costs or attorney's fees are awarded to any party in connection with plaintiff's motion. ORDERED, that the parties are hereby advised that an appeal of this order may be taken to District Judge David N. Hurd. Any such appeal must be filed within fourteen days from the date of service of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 10/16/15. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
June 16, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 80) be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as described herein. RECOMMENDED that all claims against defendants Murray,Graham, and Wright be dismissed. RECOMMENDED that, if the above recommendations are accepted, the causes of action described herein remain for trial. Objections to R&R due by 7/5/2016 Case Review Deadline 7/7/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 6/16/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the 85 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (ECF No. 80) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as described herein. Defendants Murray, Graham and Wright are DISMISSED from this action. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/31/17. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail) (alh, )