Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-390 - Fox v. Lee et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-390 - Fox v. Lee et al
August 5, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: The parties shall be afforded 60 days from today's date to conduct discovery as described herein. The parties shall supplement their briefing on these issues within 75 days of today's date, and also supplement the record with copies of any evidence collected in discovery that the parties deem relevant to the issues before the Court. The Court will determine whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary after examining this additional evidence and briefing. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 8/5/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
August 31, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 67) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 8/31/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
October 27, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: The Defendants are hereby ordered to produce the filings that are the subject of the Court's August 5, 2016 Order, dkt. # 66, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order. Failure to file the material as ordered by the Court will cause the Court to impose one or more of the above sanctions. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/27/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
February 5, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 111) be DENIED. RECOMMENDED, that defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) (Dkt. No. 118) be DENIED without prejudice, and with opportunity to renew by way of a combined motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment limited to the issue of exhaustion or, in the alternative, by way of an exhaustion hearing, should defendants request such a hearing. RECOMMENDED, that if the District Judge adopts this Report- Recommendation and Order in full, the Clerk of the Court will return this case to the Magistrate Judge to set deadlines for this renewed motion. Objections to R&R due by 2/22/2018 Case Review Deadline 2/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/5/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (Attachments: # (1) Unpublished Opinions Cited)(alh, )
February 5, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that plaintiff's motions for contempt (Dkt. Nos. 117, 129, 130, 131, 138) be DENIED. ORDERED, that insofar as plaintiff's motions may be read as a motion for leave to to amend his complaint (Dkt. Nos. 117, 129, 130, 131, 138), such motion be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 2/22/2018 Case Review Deadline 2/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/5/18. (Attachments: # (1) Unpublished Opinions Cited) (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
March 6, 2018
PDF | More
DECISION & ORDER: Plaintiff's 128 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/6/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
March 6, 2018
PDF | More
8], those motions are DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/6/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )ORDER: Plaintiff's objections, dtk. #s 150, 151, to the Reports-Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Hummel, dkt. #s 144, 145, are hereby OVERRULED. The Reports-Recommendations are hereby ACCEPTED, as follows: 1. Plaintiff's motion for Summary Judgment, dkt. # 111, is hereby DENIED; 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss, dkt. # 118, is hereby DENIED without prejudice and with an opportunity to renew by way of a combined motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment limited to the issue of exhaustion or, in the alternative, by way of an exhaustion hearing, should the Defendants request such a hearing; 3. The case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge to set deadlines for any renewed motion to dismiss based on exhaustion; 4. Plaintiff's motions for contempt, dkt. #s 117, 129, 130, 131, 138 are hereby DENIED; and 5. Insofar as Plaintiff's motions can be read as motions for leave to amend his Complaint, dkt. #s 117, 129, 130, 131, [13