Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-805 - Waters v. Melendez et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-805 - Waters v. Melendez et al
January 31, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED that 53 defendants Melendez, Muschett, Gutwein, Prack, Bedard, Lamphere, and Rivera's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) be: 1. GRANTED as to all claims against defendants Gutwein and Prack. 2. DENIED as to all claims against defendants Melendez, Muschett, Bedard, Lamphere, and Rivera. RECOMMENDED that defendants Bedard, Lamphere, and Rivera's motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) be GRANTED. RECOMMENDED that defendants Gutwein, Prack, Bedard, Lamphere, and Rivera be dismissed from this action. Objections to R&R due by 2/17/2017 Case Review Deadline 2/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 1/31/17. (Attachments: # (1) case law cited)(nas, )
March 13, 2017
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 63, is hereby ADOPTED. The Defendants' motion to dismiss, dkt. # 53, is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1. The motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Gutwein and Prack and DENIED with respect to Defendants Melendez, Muschett, Bedard, Lamphere, and Rivera; and 2. The motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (12)(b)(6) is hereby GRANTED with respect to Defendants Bedard, Lamphere, and Rivera. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendant Muschett, dkt. # 66, is hereby DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/13/17. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
May 18, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 81) be GRANTED with prejudice on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Alternatively, if reached, Defendants' motion for summary judgment should be GRANTED as to plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claims against C.O. Muschett, and DENIED as his plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claims against Sgt. Melendez. Objections to R&R due by 6/4/2018 Case Review Deadline 6/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 5/18/18. (Attachments: # (1) case law cited){r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
June 21, 2018
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hummel, dkt. # 88, is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Plaintiff's objections, dkt. # 90, are hereby OVERRULED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 81, is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/21/18. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
June 21, 2018
PDF | More
JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action in accordance with the 6/21/18 Decision and Order of Judge McAvoy. {judgment served via regular mail on plaintiff} (nas)