Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-403 - Scott et al v. Uhler et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-403 - Scott et al v. Uhler et al
February 8, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED that 35 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim be GRANTED. RECOMMENDED, that if this Report-Recommendation and Order is adopted, plaintiffs be given thirty (30) days from any such order allowing for an opportunity to amend the complaint. Objections to R&R due by 2/27/2017 Case Review Deadline 3/1/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/8/17. (Attachments: # (1) case law cited){r&r served via regular mail on plaintiffs}(nas, )
March 17, 2017
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Court accepts and adopts Magistrate Judge Hummel's February 8, 2017 Report-Recommendation and Order, Dkt. No. 47, in its entirety. Accordingly, defendants' motion for dismissal (Dkt. No. 35) is GRANTED, and the Complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs are given leave of thirty (30) days in which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs are advised that if they file an amended complaint, they must properly allege in the amended complaint all factual bases for all claims asserted therein. The failure to file an amended complaint within this time frame will be deemed as an abandonment of the dismissed claims, and a "with prejudice" dismissal will be entered on the Court's docket on the dismissed claims without further order by the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/17/17. {order served via regular mail on plaintiffs}(nas, )
May 24, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that Defendants' motion to dismiss based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 60) be: GRANTED, as to Scott's First Amendment claims; GRANTED, as to Scott's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claims; and DENIED, as to Scott's Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claims; Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2018 Case Review Deadline 6/14/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 5/24/18. (Attachments: # (1) case law cited){r&r served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
June 25, 2018
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hummel, dkt. # 63, is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Plaintiff's objections, dkt. # 64, are hereby OVERRULED. ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss, dkt. # 60, is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: 1. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment claims, and those claims are hereby DISMISSED; 2. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims, and those claims are hereby DISMISSED; and 3. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claims. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/25/18. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)