Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-577 - Washington v. Kelly


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-577 - Washington v. Kelly
January 31, 2007
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation that Washington's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as time-barred and that all pending motions be deemed moot (Related Doc # 1, 7). Objections to R&R due by 2/14/2007. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 01/31/2007. (Hard copy mailed to petitioner.)(G,GS)
May 31, 2007
PDF | More
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/31/07 adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court denies the petition for writ of habeas corpus and deems moot all other pending motions in this case. Additionally, petitioner's request to bring a Section 1983 claim is dismissed without prejudice. (Related Docs. 37, 39, 40, 42, 46, 47, 48, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56) (M,G)
June 27, 2007
PDF | More
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/27/07 denying petitioner's motion for relief from judgment. (Related Doc. 60) (M,G)
December 11, 2008
PDF | More
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/11/07 denying petitioner's motion to dismiss his state court conviction. Further, the Court denies as moot petitioner's motion for judicial notice. The Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and no basis exists upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. (Related Docs. 77, 78) (M,G)
January 30, 2009
PDF | More
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/30/09. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion and Order, petitioner's motions for default judgment, reconsideration of the Court's 12/11/08 opinion and order and disqualification of the tribunal are denied. (Related Docs. 80, 81, 82, 83) (M,G)
February 17, 2010
PDF | More
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/17/10. As set forth in this entry, petitioner's motion to disqualify this Court is denied due to lack of merit and the Rule 60(b) motion is denied as the claims presented in the instant application were presented in petitioner's prior application. Petitioner's remaining motions for emergency medical bail, transcript of grand jury proceedings and to dismiss respondent's opposition to said motions are rendered moot and are denied given the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion. (Related Docs. 102, 103, 104, 106, 107) (M,G)