Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-253 - 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-253 - 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
March 13, 2007
PDF | More
Memorandum and Order granting plaintiff's Motion to compel discovery (Related Doc # 52). Discovery scheduling Hearing set for 3/23/2007 01:30 PM in Courtroom 17B before Hon. Ann Aldrich. Signed by Judge Ann Aldrich on 3/13/07.(C,KA)
April 4, 2007
PDF | More
Order granting Citrix Systems, Inc.'s and Citrix Online, LLC's Motion for order for issuance of Letters Rogatory(Related Doc # 78) regarding foreign authorization to take deposition of Canadian citizen. Signed by Judge Ann Aldrich on 4-4-07.(K,V) Modified text on 4/5/2007 (B, B).
March 12, 2008
PDF | More
Memorandum and Order (Related Doc # 93) (Related Doc # 124); (Related Doc # 142);(Related Doc # 146)(Related Doc # 147)t (Related Doc # 149); (Related Doc # 150); (Related Doc # 152); (Related Doc # 153)(Related Doc # 153) (Related Doc # 162)(Related Doc # 188(Related Doc # 191) (Related Doc # 192) (Related Doc # 193)(Related Doc # 194)(Related Doc # 195(Related Doc # 196)(Related Doc # 198) (Related Doc # 199)(Related Doc # 200); (Related Doc # 201) (Related Doc # 202) (Related Doc # 211). that the court grants Citrixs motion for a stay. (Doc. No. 162.) Accordingly, the court vacates all scheduled hearings and conferences and will hold all pending motions in abeyance, with the exception of Communiques motion to show cause. Citrix is ordered to notify the court when reexamination is completed. Signed by Judge Ann Aldrich on 3-12-08.(K,V)
March 20, 2008
PDF | More
Memorandum and Order The court does not hold Citrix in contempt. However, in light of Citrixs extreme negligence in uploading the entirety of its source code, the court invokes its inherent power to compensate Communique for attorneys fees and expert costs incurred as a result of Citrixs negligence. Related document 101. Signed by Judge Ann Aldrich on 3/20/08. (K,K) Modified text on 3/24/2008 (B,B).
August 7, 2009
PDF | More
Order This court has considered both parties' positions and directs the parties to immediately inform the court when the PTO reexamination is completed. Until that time, this case shall remain STAYED and administratively CLOSED subject to reopening upon written motion by any of the parties. Signed by Judge Ann Aldrich on 8/7/09. (K,K)
June 3, 2014
PDF | More
Opinion and Order: The magistrate judge's March 19, 2014 discovery order (Doc. No. 257) is affirmed, and plaintiff's alternative motion to amend its complaint (Doc. No. 261) is granted. Plaintiff shall have seven business days from the date of this Opinion and Order to file a Second Amended Complaint consistent with its proposed draft amendment. (See Doc. No. 260 -10.) Judge Sara Lioi on 6/3/2014. (P,J)
June 12, 2015
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Having considered the parties' briefs, exhibits, and arguments presented at the Markman hearing, the Court construes the disputed claim terms as set forth herein. (See Opinion). Judge Sara Lioi on 6/12/2015. (P,J)
December 21, 2015
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Citrix's motion for summary judgment that the asserted claims of the '479 patent are ineligible under Section 101 is denied, and Communique's motion for summary judgment that the asserted claims are eligible under Section 101 is granted. Further for the reasons contained herein, Communique's motion for summary judgment of direct infringement is denied. Communique's motion to excluded all evidence of prior art is also denied. Communique is not precluded, however, from objecting at trial to the introduction of prior art evidence that was, or could have been, introduced during reexamination. Citrix's motion for summary judgment on Communique's claim for induced infringement is granted, and Citrix's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim for willful infringement and injunctive relief is denied. (Related Doc # 346, 347, 352, 354) Judge Sara Lioi on 12/21/2015. (P,J)
January 10, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion: Communique's appeal of the magistrate judge's memorandum opinion and order is denied in its entirety. (Related Doc # 338, 339, 340, 341). Judge Sara Lioi on 1/10/2016. (P,J)
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial (Doc. No. 580) is denied. Judge Sara Lioi on 3/21/2017. (P,J)