Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-2213 - Perkins v. Commissioner of Social Security


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-2213 - Perkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
November 5, 2015
PDF | More
cian rule as it pertains to assignments of error one, two, three, and four (Related document 1). Signed by Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 11/5/15. (S,AA)Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court reverse the decision of the Administrative Law Judge and remand this case for reconsideration and proper analysis of plaintiff's impairments in compliance with the treating-physi
November 20, 2015
PDF | More
Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court hereby REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation, which is incorporated herein by reference. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/20/15. (LC,S) re 21
April 22, 2016
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation that the Court grant Plaintiff's application for attorney fees under the EAJA (ECF Dkt. #26) in the amount of $7,577.40. The award is to Plaintiff, but paid to Plaintiff's counsel if no federal debts are owed. Objections to R&R due by 5/6/2016. Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 4/22/2016. (S,L)
May 13, 2016
PDF | More
reby awards attorney fees in the amount of $7,577.40 to plaintiff, which shall be sent to plaintiff's counsel provided no federal debts are owed. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/13/16. (LC,S) re 32Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court he