Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-2091 - Legrand v. Intellicorp Records, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-2091 - Legrand v. Intellicorp Records, Inc. et al
March 18, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order re 14 defendant Cato Corporation's Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.For the reasons set forth, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, [#9], is converted to a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this opinion to respond to the converted motion and to address the documents attached to Defendants motion. Defendant will then have seven days to file a Reply, if appropriate. Judge Donald C. Nugent 3/18/16 (C,KA)
March 24, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 13 Motion to strike Class Allegations in Count II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; and denying 13 Motion to Dismiss Count III of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 3/22/16. (G,CA)
April 22, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 14 defendant Cato Corporation's Motion to dismiss first amended complaint (other related doc 9). Judge Donald C. Nugent 4/22/16(C,KA)
February 24, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting defendants' Motion to dismiss count of the first amended complaint (Related Doc # 52). Count One is dismissed. Consequently, plaintiff's motion for class certification in connection with this claim is denied as moot (Related Doc # 56). (other related doc 85). Judge Donald C. Nugent 2/24/17(C,KA) added link 5/26/2017 (C,KA).
May 26, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's Motion for reconsideration. Related Docs # 11, 76, 77. The motion is denied to the extent that it sought remand of Count One of the Amended Complaint. The motion for reconsideration also sought clarification of the type of dismissal ordered. It is granted in so far as the Court agrees that the dismissal of Count One should have been designated as without prejudice. The Court's previous Order issued on February 24, 2017 is hereby amended to reflect this designation. Judge Donald C. Nugent 5/26/17(C,KA)