Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-864 - Norton v. Sloan

Download Files


Document in Context
16-864 - Norton v. Sloan
September 27, 2016
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation that Norton's habeas Petition be DISMISSED because Grounds 3, 5, 6 and 7 are procedurally defaulted; Grounds 1 and 2 are not cognizable, procedurally defaulted and fail on the merits; and Ground 4 is not cognizable. Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2016. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 9/27/2016. (D,I)
February 9, 2017
PDF | More
. (Attachments: # (1) R&R)(C,D) Modified to note case number should be (1:16cv864) (D,TM).Order: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of this court. The petitioner's objections (Doc. 14) be, and the same hereby are, overruled. The petition (Doc. 1) be, and the same hereby is, denied. No certificate of appealability will issue, as reasonable judges would not debate that the petitioner's claims are all procedurally defaulted, non-cognizable, or without merit. Judge James G. Carr on 2/9/17