Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-2195 - Martin v. Ramey et al

Download Files


Document in Context
17-2195 - Martin v. Ramey et al
March 8, 2018
PDF | More
Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's Motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Related doc #'s 2,4) are denied and action is dismissed without prejudice under § 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to re-file, he must pay the full filing fee of $400 and file a Motion to Re-Open within thirty days of this Order. The Clerk's Office is directed not to accept a Motion to Re-Open unless it is accompanied by the full filing fee. No other documents will be accepted for filing unless the entire filing fee is paid and the Motion to Re-Open is granted. The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/8/2018. (H,CM)