Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-3021 - Gonzales v. Moore


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-3021 - Gonzales v. Moore
November 28, 2007
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order. On May 31, 2007 this Court granted petitioner a stay of this action to permit him to exhaust the state remedy of seeking leave to file a delayed direct appeal re 9. That (badly worded) order provided that petitioner was to notify this Court of the ruling upon such a motion within thirty days of a determination by the state court. To date this Court has heard nothing further. Considering that nearly six months have passed since the stay was entered this Court would normally expect that the state appellate court would have passed upon (and in all probability denied) a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal. This being so, petitioner is directed to notify this Court within twenty days of entry of this Order as to the status of any state court proceeding he initiated. In the event that he fails to do so this Court will dissolve the stay and restore the action to active status. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 11/28/07. (W,Jo)
March 27, 2008
PDF | More
Report and Recommended Decision. It is recommended that the petition be dismissed without further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 4/10/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 3/27/08. (W,Jo)
April 16, 2008
PDF | More
Order Adopting Magistrate Judge David Perelman's Report and Recommendation (Related document 12). Signed by Judge Peter C. Economus on 4/16/08. (BR,S)
October 9, 2008
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting Magistrate Judge David Perelman's Report and Recommendation (Related document 12). Judge Peter C. Economus on 10/9/08. (BR,S)