Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-119 - Guy et al v. Spader Freight Services

Download Files


Document in Context
14-119 - Guy et al v. Spader Freight Services
July 2, 2014
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order Plaintiff's 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis granted. Action dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). Court certifies appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge David A. Katz on 7/2/14. (G,C)
January 3, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 75 Spader Freight's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 79 Guy's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Judge Jack Zouhary on 1/3/2017. (D,L)
June 19, 2018
PDF | More
rs. Unfortunately, even otherwise good employees sometimes (intentionally or not) violate company policies, and it is within an employer's rights to enforce its policies. This is especially so here, where those policies were governed by DOT regulations intended to promote the safety of both drivers and the public. This Court rules in favor of Spader Freight on liability. Based on this ruling, there is no need to proceed to trial on the issue of damages. Judge Jack Zouhary on 6/19/2018. (D,L)Memorandum Opinion and Order. By all accounts, Roosevelt Guy was a model employee during his six-year tenure at Spader Freight. He had no disciplinary history, he was entrusted with an important assignment, and he was respected by his co-worke