Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-2434 - Buccina et al v. Grimsby


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-2434 - Buccina et al v. Grimsby
January 6, 2016
PDF | More
Order. Defendant's Motion for summary judgment (Related Doc # 26) denied. Judge James G. Carr on 1/6/2016.(G,D)
January 21, 2016
PDF | More
Order: Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Rebuttal Witness (Doc. 39), be, and the same hereby is granted. Defendant's Motion to Limit the Testimony of Neil Schechter, etc. (Doc. 44) be, and the same hereby is denied. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of John Deck III. (Doc. 46) be, and the same hereby is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Marie Roy (Doc. 47) be, and the same hereby is denied. Judge James G. Carr on 1/21/16. (C,D)
January 27, 2016
PDF | More
Order Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Preclude Application of Robinson v. Bates be, and the same hereby is, denied.(Related Doc # 49). Judge James G. Carr on 1/27/16.(C,D)
February 8, 2016
PDF | More
Order. While the general Maritime Law governs this case, there was, as a matter of law, no collision for purposes of the Inland Navigation Rules;Any statement or suggestion to the contrary in Buccina v. Grimsby, 2016 WL 246048, *2 (N.D. Ohio), be, and the same hereby is abrogated; and the Clerk shall schedule a status conference for Wednesday, February 10, 2016, for the purpose of determining whether I should certify this case, and my ruling that no collision occurred in this case, for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1292(b).. Judge James G. Carr on 2/8/2016. (G,D)
February 10, 2016
PDF | More
Order: The trial date is vacated, and all further proceedings in this case are stayed pending the Sixth Circuit's disposition of this request for interlocutory review. The parties shall submit a status report within two weeks after either the Court of Appeals' order declining interlocutory review or its decision on the merits. Judge James G. Carr on 2/10/16. (C,D)
September 22, 2016
PDF | More
Order: Defendant's motion for a setoff (Doc. 93) be, and the same hereby is,granted. Judge James G. Carr on 9/22/16.(C,D)
June 6, 2017
PDF | More
Order: On review of plaintiffs' motion for new trial, I conclude the jury lacked a legally sufficient evidentiary basis for its verdict in favor of defendant. It is, therefore, ORDERED THAT: plaintiffs motion for a new trial (Doc. 129) be, and the same hereby is, granted. The Clerk shall forthwith schedule a telephone scheduling conference. Judge James G. Carr on 6/6/2017.(C,D)