Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-544 - Nottke et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-544 - Nottke et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
September 6, 2017
PDF | More
Order: Defendant's motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, granted in part and denied in part as provided herein. The clerk of court shall forthwith set this case for a telephonic status/scheduling conference (Related Doc # 13). Judge James G. Carr on 9/6/17.(C,D)
April 10, 2018
PDF | More
Order denying defendant's Motion for protective order (Related Doc # 34). The defendant shall forthwith provide the plaintiffs with the raw data, test results, and reports, inclusive, dated September 14, 2015, and October 28, 2015, and submitted by letter in conjunction with that motion. Judge James G. Carr on 4/10/18.(C,D)
April 10, 2018
PDF | More
Amended Order denying defendant's Motion for protective order (Related Doc # 34 ). The defendant shall forthwith provide the plaintiffs with the raw data, test results, and reports, inclusive, dated September 14, 2015, and October 28, 2015, and submitted by letter in conjunction with that motion (re 41). Judge James G. Carr on 4/10/18. (C,D)
July 16, 2018
PDF | More
Order : The motion of Norfolk Southern Railroad Co. for reconsideration (Doc. 43) be, and the same hereby is, overruled. The prior order (Doc. 42) denying Norfolk Southerns motion for a protective order(Doc. 34) be, and the same hereby is, confirmed. The defendant shall produce the materials at issue within fourteen days of the date of this order. Judge James G. Carr on 7/16/18. (C,D)
August 6, 2018
PDF | More
Order: Defendant's partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 35) be, and the same hereby is, granted with prejudice. Judge James G. Carr on 8/6/18.(C,D)