Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

09-617 - Pankey v. Smith

Download Files


Document in Context
09-617 - Pankey v. Smith
September 22, 2009
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation that following review of the arguments raised in the petition and applicable law, petitioner has not demonstrated that he was in custody pursuant to state court judgment that resulted from a decision that is contrary to or involved in an unreasonable application of federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(d)(1). Further, there has been no demonstrated need for an evidentiary hearing and the petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254 should be denied and dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2009. Magistrate Judge James S. Gallas on 9/22/09. (W,G)
October 29, 2009
PDF | More
Order Adopting Magistrate Judge James Gallas' Report and Recommendation (Related document 14). Judge Peter C. Economus on 10/29/09. (BR,S)
March 24, 2010
PDF | More
Order overruling Petitioner's objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. The Court finds no reason to alter or amend the Judgment. (Related document 14). Judge Peter C. Economus on 3/24/10. (BR,S) Modified on 3/24/2010 (BR,S).