Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-791 - WRK Rarities, LLC v. United States of America, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-791 - WRK Rarities, LLC v. United States of America, et al.
April 10, 2013
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order For the aforementioned reasons, the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 3).The Court sets a preliminary injunction hearing for 5/17/2013, at 12:00 p.m., as well as the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's opening brief no later than 4/29/2013; Defendants' response no later than 5/10/2013; and Plaintiff's reply no later than 5/15/2013.The parties are reminded they are encouraged to talk to one another and attempt to resolve the dispute. Minimally, the Court will expect the parties to enter into stipulations of fact and law whenever possible.A transcript of the TRO hearing may be obtained by contacting Court Reporter Mary Uphold at 330-884-7424. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/10/2013. (S,L)
May 1, 2013
PDF | More
Complaint (or Complaint if no Amended Complaint is filed) within 60 days as provided for under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12; and 3) thereafter, the Court will set forth a normal pre-trial and trial schedule that includes discovery, dispositive motions, and Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court approves the withdrawal of Plaintiff's 3 Motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and cancels the hearing and briefing schedule previously set. Additionally, the Court approves the following requests made by the parties in the Stipulation: 1) Plaintiff will be permitted to amend its Complaint within 15 days of the Court's Order approving the Stipulation; 2) Defendants will respond to the foregoing Amendeda trial date. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/1/13. (S,HR)
November 4, 2013
PDF | More
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants the Motion to Dismiss filed by Kimpel and Leonard (ECF No. 34) and dismisses their claims without prejudice. The United States' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 27) is denied as moot. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/4/2013. (JLG)
February 29, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 70. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/29/2016. (JLG)