Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-1469 - Thomas v. Mahoning County Jail et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-1469 - Thomas v. Mahoning County Jail et al
March 28, 2014
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's claims against the Mahoning County Jail, Wellington, Szekley, Gideon, Lewis, Felton, Herman, Duncan, Denno, and Rojas are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). This action shall proceed solely against Novicky, Schoolcraft and Bielecki. The Clerk's Office is directed to forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshal for service of process and shall include a copy of this order in the documents to be served upon the remaining defendants. Judge Sara Lioi on 3/28/2014. (P,J)
December 8, 2014
PDF | More
39;s motion to amend is granted, in part (Doc. No. 8), as set forth in this Order. Plaintiff shall have leave until 1/12/2015 to file an amended complaint that raises a claim against defendants Gideon, Denno, Lewis, Felton, Herman, Duncan, and Rojas. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/8/2014. (Related Docs. 12, 13, and 15) (S,He)Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied (Doc. No. 7), and defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, in part (Doc. No. 9), in that plaintiff's claim for verbal harassment is dismissed. Plaintiff�
July 7, 2015
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The motion to dismiss of defendants Brian Gideon, Marcio Rojas, Jeremiah Felton, Joseph Herman, Sherman Duncan, and Jeffrey Lewis is granted, because plaintiff failed to name defendants before the statute of limitations expired, and failed to relate the claims back under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) (Related document 34). Signed by Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 7/7/15. (S,AA)
February 1, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons stated herein, the Court construes Plaintiff's "objections" as a motion for reconsideration, denies the motion for reconsideration (ECF Dkt. #47), grants the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Bielecki, Novicky and Schoolcraft (ECF Dkt. #59) and dismisses Plaintiffs' complaint in its entirety with prejudice. Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 2/1/2016. (S,L)