Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-842 - Crangle v. Eppinger


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-842 - Crangle v. Eppinger
February 14, 2014
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation. Court grants Petitioner's Motion to Expand the Record and/or for Evidentiary Hearing 14 in part, to extent it seeks inclusion of his 11/16/10 sentencing hearing transcript and denies same in all other respects and further recommends Respondent's motion to dismiss 8 be granted as the Petition is time-barred. Objections to R&R due by 2/28/2014. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II on 2/14/14. (A,P)
March 31, 2014
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting 17 R&R recommending Petitioner's case be dismissed with prejudice. This Court adopts the R&R's recommendation and grants in part and denies in part Petitioner's Motion for Expansion of the Record and/or Evidentiary Hearing 14. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 8 is granted, and Petitioner's Petition 1 is dismissed with prejudice on the the ground that it is time-barred. Further, this Court finds no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §2253; Federal Appellate Rule 22(b). Judge Jack Zouhary on 3/31/2014. (D,L)
March 5, 2018
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation recommending that the Amended Petition be denied. Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 3/19/2018. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II on 3/5/18. (A,P)
April 4, 2018
PDF | More
Order Adopting 54 Report and Recommendation. Crangle is currently incarcerated at Grafton Correctional Institution, where the Warden isLaShann Eppinger. Accordingly, the case caption is updated to read Thomas Charles Crangle v. Warden LaShann Eppinger. The Objection 58 is overruled. This Court adopts the Report & Recommendation 54 and the Order55 denying the Motions to Stay and to Amend, and denies the Amended Petition 41. Further, this Court certifies an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/4/2018. (D,L)