Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-007 - United States of America v. Phelps et al

Download Files


Document in Context
14-007 - United States of America v. Phelps et al
August 8, 2014
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation on Plea of Guilty as to William D. Robinson. Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2014. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 8/8/2014. (P,G)
September 17, 2014
PDF | More
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation as to William D. Robinson. (Related Doc # 265). The Defendant's plea of guilty is approved. Therefore, the Defendant is adjudged guilty of Count Two in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. Sections 841(a)(1) & 841(b)(1)(C). The sentencing will be held on November 4, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/17/2014. (P,J)
September 29, 2014
PDF | More
Opinion and Order denying defendant Larry Dorsey's motion to withdraw his guilty plea (Doc. No. 301). The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating the existence of a "fair and just" reason to permit him to withdraw his guilty plea. This case will proceed to sentencing, as scheduled, on October 29, 2014. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/29/2014. (P,J)
April 3, 2015
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion as to Larry L. Sullivan, Jr: Defendant's motion to reduce his sentence (Doc. No. 419) is denied in its entirety. Judge Sara Lioi on 4/1/2015. (P,J) Modified signature date on 4/3/2015 (H,KR).
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion: The Section 2255 motion by defendant Alonzo B. Sykes (2) (Doc. No. 465) and his "amendment" (Doc. No. 466) are denied. Defendant's motion to amend his judgment (Doc. No. 476) is granted, and the Court shall issue an amended judgment entry. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Section 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Sara Lioi on 3/31/2017. (P,J) Civil Case 5:16-cv-01603-SL closed.
April 20, 2018
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order as to Alonzo B. Sykes (2): Even though the Court finds that no revision to the Presentence Investigation Report is necessary under Rule 32, the Court will direct that the Presentence Investigation Report reflect the fact that the Court did not accept the recommendation to apply the two-level weapon enhancement. To this extent, Sykes' motion to revise (Doc. No. 505) and motion to amend (Doc. No. 508) are granted, and the Court hereby instructs the writer of the Presentence Investigation Report to revise that document with a notation at paragraph 40 stating that "Although properly assessed, the Court did not apply these two points when determining the defendant's offense level." (Related Doc. Nos. 317, 520). Judge Sara Lioi on 4/20/2018. (P,J)