Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1272 - Holly Anderson v. Connie Sutton, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1272 - Holly Anderson v. Connie Sutton, et al
March 31, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court (1) grants in part and denies in part the County Defendants' Motion to Strike (ECF No. 88); (2) grants the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Anderson's claims (ECF No. 81); and (3) denies the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Sutton's cross-claims (ECF No. 82). The matter shall proceed to trial. A separate Trial Order will issue. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/31/2016. (JLG)
December 30, 2016
PDF | More
Memorandum of Opinion and Order for the reasons set forth herein Portage County Defendants' Crossclaim against Defendant Sutton is moot and dismissed without prejudice. The Court declares that Portage County Defendants had a duty to defend Sutton in this action. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Count Two of Defendant Sutton's crossclaims. Count Two is dismissed without resolution and without prejudice. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/30/2016. (E,CK)