Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-2312 - Wright v. General Motors Company et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-2312 - Wright v. General Motors Company et al
January 31, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, this action is dismissed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B). The Court denies as moot Plaintiff's pending motions to serve the summons and complaint (ECF No.ourt certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/31/2017. (E,CK) 3), to reassign the case to Judge Polster (ECF No. 4), for permission for electronic case filing (ECF No. 9), and to request counsel invitation and judicial notice of relevant filings (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff's motion to supplement his Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d) (ECF No. 11) is denied because it does not cure the deficiencies in his original complaint and is futile. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2 and 8) is granted. The C