Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-2426 - Darby v. Kagler, et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-2426 - Darby v. Kagler, et al
July 5, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion: The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is granted, and for the reasons stated above, her action is summarily dismissed pursuant 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. (Related Doc. No. 1 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 7/5/2017. (P,J)
September 18, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion: The motion of pro se plaintiff Mary Louise Darby styled "Motion to Refile[,] Motion to Amend Complaint[,] Writ of Certiorari on Court[,] Memorandum Opinion[,]" which the Court interprets as a motion to amend (Doc. No. 5) is denied. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/18/2017. (P,J)
May 8, 2018
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion: For all of the reasons set forth in the Court's September 18, 2017 Memorandum Opinion, reproduced above, Darby's motion to amend (Doc. No. 7) and motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 9) are denied. Her motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 8) is denied as moot. Because it was improvidently submitted, the Court also instructs the Clerk to return to Darby her proposed notarized complaint. Further, Darby is cautioned that if she continues to file repetitive, baseless motions and materials, the Court will consider taking action to restrict her court access by requiring her to obtain leave of court before submitting any additional filings. See Filipas v. Lemons, 835 F.2d 1145, 1146 (6th Cir. 1987). The Court would prefer not to take this extraordinary measure but will do so, if it must, to prevent the abuse of the judicial process. Judge Sara Lioi on 5/8/2018. (P,J)