Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

92-796 - Thompson v. Norton, City of, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
92-796 - Thompson v. Norton, City of, et al
January 4, 2010
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order. This Court will grant the defendant until January 15 to file responses. If the motions are not opposed this Court will grant the motion tor revive judgment, and will grant the plaintiff ninety days within which to pursue discovery on the motion regarding payment of the judgment, following which plaintiff shall advise this Court if a hearing on the motion is requested or whether the motion is to be abandoned. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 1/4/10. (W,Jo)
February 11, 2010
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 2/11/10. (W,Jo)
March 15, 2010
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs counsel has filed a pleading captioned as Plaintiffs Appeal Pursuant To Rule 72(a) From Magistrate Judge David S. Perelmans March 1, 2010 memorandum Opinion And Order (Doc. #97). In the body thereof it is stated that such appeal is pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and Local Civil Rule 72.3(a).Each of those Rules applies to matters before a Magistrate Judge upon referral of a District Judge. This Case was before this Court consequent to consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, thereby vesting full jurisdiction in this Court. Therefore, any appeal form rulings of this Court must be to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and review may not be obtained under Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules.This being so, plaintiffs submission is procedurally improper, and shall be stricken from therecord. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 3/15/10. (W,Jo)