Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

09-353 - Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
09-353 - Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
August 4, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT - It is accordingly ORDERED that Doc. No. 20, captioned as "Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment," be stricken, without prejudice to the arguments made therein on the merits, which of course are also made in the duplicate filing at Doc. No. 19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/4/2010. (kpf1)
November 14, 2011
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that Petitioner Thomas J. Barton's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Doc. 1, PageID 1), be denied. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Mr. Barton should be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability. Objections to R&R due by 12/1/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/14/2011. (kpf1)
February 8, 2012
PDF | More
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. it is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. It is also recommended that Petitioner be granted a certificate of appealability on his First Ground for Relief, but denied a certificate of appealability on Grounds Two and Three. Objections to R&R due by 2/27/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/7/2012. (mdf1)
August 2, 2012
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 44 Report and Recommendation, 49 Supplemental Report and Recommendation. The Court DENIES WITH PREJUDICE Petitioners Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1. The Court ISSUES a certificate of appealability with respect to the claim in Ground One but DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability with respect to Grounds Two and Three. Finally, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง1915(a)(3), this Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this order as to Ground One should be taken in good faith, and any application to appeal in forma pauperis should be GRANTED.Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 8/2/2012. (km1)
September 30, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The prior judgment having been vacated, the above-captioned case should be dismissed as moot. re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas Barton. Objections to R&R due by 10/17/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/30/16. (pb)
October 26, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - It is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 65) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that this case be, and it hereby is, DISMISSED AS MOOT.. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 10/25/2016. (jee)