Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-673 - Hiles v. Army Review Board Agency et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-673 - Hiles v. Army Review Board Agency et al
September 20, 2012
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marshall G Hiles. 1. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. 2. Plaintiff be GRANTED an extension of time of thirty (30) days from the date of any Order adopting this Recommendation to pay the required filing fee of $350.00 or to submit an affidavit showing his income, assets, and debts are such that he is unable to provide himself and his family with the necessities of life and still have sufficient funds to pay the full filing of $350.00 in order to institute this action. Plaintiff's complaint should not be deemed "filed" until the appropriate filing fee is paid or he is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff should also be advised that if he fails to pay the filing fee or submit an affidavit in support of his application to proceed in forma pauperis within the thirty (30) day time limit this matter will be closed. Objections to R&R due by 10/9/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/20/12. (lk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/20/2012: # (1) Certified Mail Receipt) (lk).
October 31, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; adopting Report and Recommendation 2. Case is recommitted to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/31/12. (do1)
August 12, 2014
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 54 MOTION to Amend and request for Summary Judgment be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 8/29/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/12/2014. (art)
September 16, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 54 Motion to Amend and Request for summary judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation 61. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 9/16/14. (mb)
September 16, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation (doc. 38) as modified. The Report and Recommendation is modified to reflect that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions of the ABCMR. Count I is not dismissed at this time; Defendants Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 15) is GRANTED as to plaintiffs second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth claims against defendants. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 15) is DENIED with respect to plaintiffs first claim. Plaintiffs Motion to Admit New Evidence (doc. no. 58) is DENIED. Plaintiffs Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs First claim is RECOMMITTED to the United State Magistrate for further proceedings according to the principles of administrative law. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 9/16/14. (mb)
December 10, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying plaintiff's 74 Motion to Strike defendant's affirmative defenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/10/2014. (art) (This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 10, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting plaintiff's 90 Motion to extend briefing schedule dates. Parties' briefs on subject matter jurisdiction due on or before 4/30/2015; Parties' opposing briefs due on or before 5/21/2015; Parties' reply briefs due on or before 6/4/2015. Plaintiff's 91 Motion to require defendants to participate in mediation is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/10/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 13, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER that plaintiff's 99 Motion for Recusal is Denied insofar as plaintiff moves for recusal of the Magistrate Judge. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 99 MOTION for recusal be Denied insofar as plaintiff moves for recusal of the District Judge; defendants' 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment and renewed motion to dismiss be Granted; and plaintiff's 101 MOTION to Vacate the District Court's Order in part be Denied. ( Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/13/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 12, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 104). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/12/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 19, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 116 MOTION to Stay this case be Denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 11/7/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/19/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 8, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 118). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/8/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)