Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-226 - Durham v. Chief Bureau of Classification and Reception et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-226 - Durham v. Chief Bureau of Classification and Reception et al
August 19, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 4,5 and 6 Motions for Extension of Time to file a response to the Deficiency Order issued 4/15/2013. Plaintiff's 17 Motion to disregard his motion for voluntary dismissal of the complaint is Granted. Therefore, plaintiff's 16 Motion for voluntary dismissal of the complaint is Denied as moot. Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Extension of Time to file an amended complaint is Granted. Plaintiff is directed to file a second amended complaint, which must not exceed 20 pages in lenght within (21) days of the date of filing of this Order. Plaintiff is hereby notified that if he fails to comply with this Order, the action may be dismissed for failure to comply with FRCP 8. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/19/2013. (art)
January 8, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 35. The second amended complaint is dismissed. This case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 1/8/14. (mb)
June 20, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 48 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendation 54 denying plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss certain defendants; denying motions to amend complaint and to stay case. This case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 6/20/14. (mb)
November 26, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/25/2014. To the extent that plaintiff seeks an extension of time by which to respond to defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings, see Doc. 68, plaintiffs request is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted an extension of thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order by which to file his response to defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs motion to file a third amended complaint (Doc. 68) be DENIED and that plaintiffs claims against the unserved defendants named in plaintiffs second amended complaint be DISMISSED in their entirety.Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a response to defendants judgment on the pleadings within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order. Objections to R&R due by 12/15/2014. (Attachments: # (1) Certified Mail Receipt) (jee1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 31, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/31/14. Plaintiff's 74 Objections are OVERRULLED; Plaintiff's 68 Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint is DENIED; and the unserved DEFENDANTS named in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to effect service of process. (eh1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 11, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 77). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/11/2015. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 14, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 79 Motion to prevent dismissal. The parties are Ordered to submit supplemental briefs in accordance with this opinion within (30) days of the entry of this Order. Parties supplmental brief is due by 6/14/2015. Plaintiff's 82 supplemental complaint is Striken form the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/12/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 2, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER that plaintiff's 91 Motion to Stay is Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 65 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings be Granted. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. (Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/2/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 30, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 93). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/30/15. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting plaintiff's 115 motion to stay is Granted, and the Court has considered the new information plaintiff has asserted in his motion for leave to supplement his motion to stay. For good cause shown, defendants' 112 and 114 motions for extension of time are Granted and plaintiff's 113 motion is Granted to the extent it seeks an extension of time. The deadline for the parties to file their supplemental briefs concerning the impact of Surles on the exhaustion issues in this case is extended to 1/10/2017. To the extent that plaintiff seeks a stay of proceedings of at least three months, plaintiff has filed to present any evidence to support his allegations that he cannot safely access legal materials due to an "ongoing campaign" by other inmates "to taunt, harass, and physically attack him." Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to stay proceedings is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/6/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 14, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that plaintiff's 125 Motion to defer ruling is Denied as Moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/13/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 14, 2017
PDF | More
n sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 121 SECOND MOTION for Leave to File a third amended complaint be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/13/2017. (art)(This document has bee
May 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING 137 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 137 Report and Recommendations; Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. 138, 139) are OVERRULED; Plaintiff's second motion for leave of court to file a third amended complaint (Doc. 121) is DENIED; This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/31/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 2, 2018
PDF | More
AMENDED DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Doc. 137; (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS Docs. 138, 139; AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Doc. 121. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/02/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)