Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-468 - Dillingham v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-468 - Dillingham v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
June 5, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/5/2014. (gh1)
June 6, 2014
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Dillingham - it is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/6/2014. (gh1) Modified to clarify docket text on 6/9/2014 (sct1).
July 28, 2014
PDF | More
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice and that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability. Objections to R&R due by 8/14/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/28/2014. (kpf1)
September 2, 2014
PDF | More
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS = Based on the foregoing analysis, it is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 9/19/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/2/2014. (kpf1)
September 29, 2014
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - Because Dillingham has not shown a manifest error of law in denying his motion for evidentiary hearing at this stage of the proceedings, his Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/29/2014. (kpf1)
October 30, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 41 Report and Recommendations, 37 Report and Recommendations, 33 Report and Recommendations,, Petitioner's Objections are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations are ADOPTED. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 10/30/2014. (jlw1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/30/2014: # (1) Certified Mail Receipt) (jee).
June 14, 2017
PDF | More
d by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/14/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEFFROM JUDGMENT 57 - It is respectfully recommended that the instant Motion for Relief from Judgment be DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/28/2017. Signe
June 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Document 58 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/30/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)