Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-325 - Roland v. Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-325 - Roland v. Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc. et al
October 2, 2015
PDF | More
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 10/1/15. (mb) Modified docket text on 10/5/2015 (eh).
March 8, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting plaintiff's 40 Motion for Leave to Appear by telephone at the March 9, 2017 (3:00 pm) Fairness Hearing before Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/8/2017. (art) Modified on 3/8/2017 to correct date previously listed in docket text (art).
March 10, 2017
PDF | More
FINAL ORDER: (A) APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT UNDER FRCP 23 AND (B) APPROVING CLASS COUNSEL'S FEES AND EXPENSES. Further Ordered that on the effective date, the settlement shall become binding upon the Parties and the Settlement Class. Class Counsel is awarded fees of thirty-three and one-third (33 1/3 %) of the gross Settlement Amount of $250,000 after (1) deducting the Class Representative's service award, and (2) reimbursing Class Counsel's out of pocket costs and expenses, including the cost of administration, which reimbursement is capped at $20,000, to be payable exclusively from the Settlement Amount. Further Ordered that the Class Representative is awarded $7,500 in addition to her pro rata share of the Settlement, as compensation for her service on behalf of the Settlement Class, to be payable exclusively from the Settlement Amount. Further Ordered that entry of this Order is without prejudice to the relief granted in the Preliminary Order aated to the relief granted by this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/10/2017. (art)nd entry of this Order shall not serve to extend or stay any time of filing an appeal regarding any of the relief granted in the Preliminary Order. Further Ordered that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over all matters arising pursuant to or rel