Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-448 - Padilla v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-448 - Padilla v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
February 10, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 6 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS RECOMMENDED that (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 6 be GRANTED and Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC Section 2254 1 be DISMISSED with prejudice on the ground that the petition is time-bared under 28 USC Section 2244(d); (2) that a certificate of appealability should not issue with respect to any of the claims for relief alleged in the petition; and (3) the Court certify pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in "good faith," and therefore, DENY Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. Objections to R&R due by 2/29/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/10/2016. (km) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 8, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Respondents motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is GRANTED and petitionerspetition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/8/2016. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)