Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-641 - Bonds v. University of Cincinnati Medical Center et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-641 - Bonds v. University of Cincinnati Medical Center et al
March 9, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 26 Motion for Sanctions; and plaintiff's 27 Motion to Strike. The status conference in this matter is hereby reset for Thursday, 8/4/2016 at 2:00 pm via telphone before MJ Litkovitz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/9/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 16, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying plaintiff's 36 Motion to Compel; denying as moot plaintiff's 37 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. The Clerk is Directed to sent doc. 19 to plaintiff by regular mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/15/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER that defendants' 58 Motion to vacate the scheduling order and stay discovery is Granted. The scheduling order 19 is Vacated. Discovery is Stayed pending further Order of the Court. Plaintiff's 42 Motion to Compel is Denied; Plaintiff's 47 Motion to compel the release of his medical records is Denied; Plaintiff's 45 Motion to Appoint Counsel, and his 45 Motion to extend the scheduling order by (120) days is Denied a moot; and plaintiff's 59 Motion for the Clerk to provided non-party subpoenas for plaintiff to serve is Denied a moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/7/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 18, 2016
PDF | More
) Modified to correct document number text only on 11/18/2016 (art).ORDER denying plaintiff's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 55 & 61 plaintiff's MOTIONS to Compel; and granting plaintiff's 65 Motion for leave to submit an amended complaint subject to sua sponte review of the amended complaint by the Court pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/18/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.
November 23, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER dismissing plaintiff's amended complaint against the Office of the Attorney General of Kentucky, the Kentucky State Police, and the Commonwealth of Kentucky with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Counts I, II, VI and VII and Paragraph 12 (alleging a claim of conspiracy) of the amended complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim (Counts III and V) against defendants UCMC, Posey, unknown UCMC security guard, UCMC security staff, the Office of the Attorney General of Kentucky, the Kentucky State Police, and the Commonwealth of Kentucky is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim (Count IV) against the Office of the Attorney General of Kentucky, former Kentucky Attorney General Conway, the Kentucky State Police, and the Commonwealth of Kentucky is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. It is ORDERED that the United States Marshal serve a copy of the original complaint 3 and amended complaint 72, a summons, and this Order upon defendants Two Unknown Kentucky State Police Officers and former Kentucky Attorney General Conway as directed by plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/23/16. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 21, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER following 82 Informal Discovery Conference held on 12/21/2016- resolving the parties' discovery dispute 44. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/21/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying the Two Unknown KSP Officers' 86 Motion to Dismiss the complaint; Defendant Conway's 96 Motion to Dismiss is Denied; Plaintiff's 105 Motion to Amend the complaint to add defendants is Denied; Plaintiff's 106 Motion for relief against attorneys is Denied; Plaintiff's 111 Motion for Leave to File a sur-reply is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/15/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that plaintiff's 143 MOTION for leave to file a second amended complaint is Denied. The UCMC defendants' 130 Motion for judgment on the pleadings is Granted. Defendants UCMC, UCMC security staff, and Mike Posey are Dismissed from the case. Defendant Conway's 132 Motion for Protective Order is Granted in part. Plaintiff may take defendant Conway's oral deposition but the deposition must take place in the ADR Suite of the Courthouse Building in Cincinnati, Ohio, and arrangements to use the ADR Suite must be made through the Court. Plaintiff's 136 Motion to Strike defendant Conway's motion for protective order is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/24/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 28, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER regarding Court's decision on discovery issues raised by the parties following the 152 Status Conference / Informal Discovery Conference held on 8/25/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/28/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)