Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-284 - Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Ohio Department of Transportation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-284 - Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Ohio Department of Transportation et al
May 4, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 25 MOTION to Deposit Funds and to be Dismissed as Parties filed by Defendants' Ohio Department of Transportation, Ohio Department of Budget and Management. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Motion of the Ohio Department of Transportation and the Ohio Office of Budget and Management to Deposit Funds and to be Dismissed as Parties 25 be GRANTED. Upon adoption of this Report and Recommendation by the presiding district judge, the Ohio Defendants should be permitted to deposit $589,049.49 into the Registry of this Court under Local Rule 77.2 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 67(a), and should simultaneously be dismissed from this litigation. Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/4/2017. (km)
May 25, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Accordingly, the motion of defendants Ohio Department of Transportation and Ohio Office of Budget and Management to Deposit Fund (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Ohio defendants are permitted to deposit $589,049.49 into the Registry of this Court under Local Rul 77.2 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 67(a) and are simultaneously dismissed from this litigation. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 5/25/2017. (jlw)
November 22, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 43 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, 45 Defendant Internal Revenue Service's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT F&Ds motion for summary judgment 43 be GRANTED, and that the cross-motion of the IRS for summary judgment 45 be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT if this R&R is adopted by the Court, the Funds on deposit with this Court shall be released in their entirety to F&D, and this case should be closed. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 11/22/2017. (km)