Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-485 - Davis v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-485 - Davis v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
December 9, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER that petitioner's 6 Motion for Leave to incorporate additional exhibits as attachments to his petition is Granted. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 10 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted and petitioner's 4 petition for writ of habeas corpus be Dismissed with prejudice on the ground that it is time-barred. Any of appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. ( Objections to R&R due by 12/27/2016). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/9/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 29, 2017
PDF | More
ood faith, and therefore DENIES petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 4/3/2017 (eh).ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/29/17. Respondent's 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Petitioners pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice on the ground that it is time-barred. A certificate of appealability will not issue. The Court will certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in g