Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-554 - Richardson v. Law Offices of Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-554 - Richardson v. Law Offices of Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C. et al
February 28, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 Defendants Law Offices of Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C. and Meredith E. Unger's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings 14 be GRANTED, that Plaintiff's motion to strike 17 be DENIED, that judgment be entered in favor of the Defendants, and that this case be CLOSED. In the alternative, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Defendants' motion be GRANTED IN PART as to all time-barred claims under the FDCPA and OCSPA, and as to the FCRA claims, but that the motion otherwise be denied without prejudice to re-file a dispositive motion on the same grounds following a short period of discovery. Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/28/2017. (km) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS accordingly defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings 14 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to strike 17 is DENIED. Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant's and this case is hereby TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/21/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)