Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1065 - Lester v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1065 - Lester v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
November 30, 2016
PDF | More
ns to R&R due by 12/19/2016). (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified to correct docket text on 12/1/2016 (sct).ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/29/16. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: Plaintiff's claim against the ODRC be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff may proceed with his claim for damages against defendant Osgood in her individual capacity. The US Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, doc. 5 ORDER, and this Order and Report and Recommendation upon defendant DeAnn Osgood as directed by plaintiff. ( Objectio
December 15, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 7). Plaintiff's claim against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/15/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying plaintiff's 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; and denying plaintiff's 13 Motion to Compel. The Ohio Attorney General is Ordered to submit under seal to the Clerk of Court, within (14) days of the date of this Order, a current address where defendant DeAnn Osgood may be served with process. The Ohio Attorney General shall file a notice of compliance with the Court after he has fulfilled this requirement. The Clerk is Directed not to post defendant Osgood's address on the public docket and to redact any documents submitted for filing that bear defendant Osgood's address. Further, the Clerk is Directed to ensure service upon defendant Osgood of all documents filed by plaintiff. The Clerk shall mail any documents filed by plaintiff to defendant Osgood at the address provided by the Ohio Attorney General, which shall be kept under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/27/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 12, 2017
PDF | More
aintiff's motion to appoint counsel is Denied as moot. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 15 & 21 MOTIONS for Default Judgment be Denied. ( Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz oORDER that plaintiff's 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel is Denied. Plaintiff's 27 Motion for ruling on his second motion for appointment of counsel is Denied as moot. Defendant Osgood's 30 Motion for Leave to File surreply to pln 6/12/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 6/13/2017 (art).
September 8, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting defendant Osgood's 42 Motion to Stay discovery. The discovery and dispositive motion deadlines are Stayed pending resolution of defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/8/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 13, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying plaintiff's 32 Motion for relief. Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Strike discovery from the record is Granted. The Clerk is Directed to strike documents 33 & 34 from the docket. Plaintiff's 49 Motion for clarification is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/13/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 24, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER that defendant's 45 MOTION to strike plaintiff's sur-reply memorandum is Granted; and plaintiff's 46 & 47 request[s] for leave to file answers to defendant's allegations with respect to plaintiff's motion to strike are Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant Osgood's 36 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings be Granted in part to the extent plaintiff's alleged claims of sexual abuse include discrete acts pre-dating November 9, 1994, and defendant Osgood's 36 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings be Denied in all other respects. ( Objections to R&R due by 2/7/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/24/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)