Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1179 - Surgenor v. Moore et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1179 - Surgenor v. Moore et al
February 1, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: Plaintiffs complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยงยง1915( e )(2)(B) and l 9 l 5A(b )(1 ). Objections to R&R due by 2/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/1/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 8, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 9 & 11 MOTION for preliminary injunction be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/22/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/8/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 8, 2017
PDF | More
ant Moore to "Mohr" and to add an additional prayer for relief. Objections to R&R due by 3/22/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/8/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 5/31/2017 (art).SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 10 MOTION to amend the complaint should be Denied in part and Granted in part pursuant to this report and recommendation including plaintiff's motion to correct the name of defend
December 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Reports and Recommendations (Docs. 4, 12) and Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. 13) are ADOPTED; Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 26) are OVERRULED; Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. 9) is DENIED;The claims asserted in Plaintiffs complaint (Doc. 3) are DISMISSED; Plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 10) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks leave to correct the name of Defendant Moore to Mohr, and to the extent it seeks leave to add: (A) Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim regarding deprivation of meals by Defendants Berry, Holley and Ley;(B) Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Bell, Berry, and Saylor, and (C) Plaintiffs First Amendment claim alleging a violation of Plaintiffs right to freely exercise his Christian religion against Defendant Cherry Holmes;to the extent Plaintiffs motion to amend the Complaint (Doc. 10) seeks to add additional claims and/or additional defendants, it is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/27/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)