United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2015-05-08
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2008-03-26
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015
P0b002ee18c3628b9
DGPO
2015-05-08
2015-05-08
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015
District
ohsd
6th
Ohio
2393
2:05-cv-01015
Columbus
civil
440
Other Civil Rights
42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Apanovich et al v. Wilkinson et al
2:05-cv-01015
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015
JU 4.15
2:05-cv-01015;05-1015
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
6th Circuit
Columbus
U.S. Courts
author
aut
Anthony Apanovich
Apanovich
Anthony
Plaintiff
Cleveland Challenger
Cleveland Challenger
Plaintiff
Terry J Collins
Collins
Terry
Defendant
James Haviland
Haviland
James
Defendant
Steve Huffman
Huffman
Steve
Defendant
Phil Kearns
Kearns
Phil
Defendant
Cindy Mollick
Mollick
Cindy
Plaintiff
Ohio Stop Offenders Rehabilitate & Treat
Ohio Stop Offenders Rehabilitate & Treat
Plaintiff
Kevin Osborne
Osborne
Kevin
Plaintiff
Reginald A Wilkinson
Wilkinson
Reginald
Defendant
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015
District
ohsd
6th
Ohio
2393
2:05-cv-01015
Columbus
civil
440
Other Civil Rights
42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Ohio
Apanovich et al v. Wilkinson et al
OPINION AND ORDER: As it relates to plaintiff Anthony Apanovich's claims, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, doc 5 is GRANTED. The claims of this plaintiff are DISMISSED w/o prejudice for failure to exhaust. As the motion relates to the claims of the remaining plaintiffs, the motion to dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Norah McCann King on 7/22/06. (er )
0
2006-07-21
D09002ee18c41fcbd
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-0
ohsd-2_05-cv-01015_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015/pdf/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-0.pdf
USCOURTS 2:05-cv-01015; Apanovich et al v. Wilkinson et al;
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
Ohio
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-0
0
2006-07-21
OPINION AND ORDER: As it relates to plaintiff Anthony Apanovich's claims, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, doc 5 is GRANTED. The claims of this plaintiff are DISMISSED w/o prejudice for failure to exhaust. As the motion relates to the claims of the remaining plaintiffs, the motion to dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Norah McCann King on 7/22/06. (er )
Apanovich et al v. Wilkinson et al
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs' 39 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is DENIED. Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to file, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Opinion and Order, an amended motion for leave to file a revised Second Amended Complaint, addressing the deficiencies and ambiguities discussed in this order. Defendants' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Signed by Norah McCann King on 3/26/2008. (er1 )
1
2008-03-26
D09002ee18c41fcbc
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-1
ohsd-2_05-cv-01015_1.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-1
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015/pdf/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-1.pdf
USCOURTS 2:05-cv-01015; Apanovich et al v. Wilkinson et al;
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
Ohio
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_05-cv-01015-1
1
2008-03-26
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs' 39 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is DENIED. Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to file, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Opinion and Order, an amended motion for leave to file a revised Second Amended Complaint, addressing the deficiencies and ambiguities discussed in this order. Defendants' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Signed by Norah McCann King on 3/26/2008. (er1 )