Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-160 - Trimbur et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-160 - Trimbur et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
September 24, 2014
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER denying 56 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 9/23/2014. (pes1)
November 25, 2014
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice to re-filing 48 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court vacates 44 the Order Setting Trial Date and Settlement Conference. The Clerk is directed to issue an amended scheduling order. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 11/25/2014. (dh1)
January 16, 2015
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 92 and 93 Motion to Compel. Replies to 90 Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/17/2015. Responses to 106Motion for Partial Summary Judgment due by 2/6/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 1/16/2015. (pes1)
August 10, 2015
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 117 Defendants' Motion to Strike; granting 106 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part 90 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 08/10/2015. (dh1)
September 28, 2015
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER denying 125 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 9/28/2015. (pes)
March 2, 2016
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 139 Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate Plaintiff's Punitive Damage and Attorney Fee Claims and to Reconsider the Court's Decision Denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the Punitive Damage and Attorney Fee Claims and denying as moot 163 Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Financial Condition. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 03/02/2016. (dh1)
March 23, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: The parties have advised the Court that a settlement has been reached in this case. The Court directs the Clerk to administratively close this case and remove it from this Court's active docket. The case may be re-opened upon proper motion of any party. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 03/23/2016. (dh1)