United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2016-04-06
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2016-04-05
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839
P0b002ee18f209b3d
DGPO
2016-04-06
2016-04-06
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839
District
ohsd
6th
Ohio
2393
2:14-cv-00839
Columbus
civil
530
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coonrod v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
2:14-cv-00839
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839
JU 4.15
2:14-cv-00839;14-839
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
6th Circuit
Columbus
U.S. Courts
author
aut
Wesley Coonrod
Coonrod
Wesley
Petitioner
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Respondent
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839
District
ohsd
6th
Ohio
2393
2:14-cv-00839
Columbus
civil
530
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ohio
Coonrod v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/4/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/16/2015. (kpf)
0
2015-12-16
D09002ee18f2125d2
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-0
ohsd-2_14-cv-00839_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/pdf/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-0.pdf
USCOURTS 2:14-cv-00839; Coonrod v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution;
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
Ohio
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-0
0
2015-12-16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/4/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/16/2015. (kpf)
Coonrod v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the case in light of the Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 3/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/2/2016. (kpf)
1
2016-03-02
D09002ee18f2125d1
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-1
ohsd-2_14-cv-00839_1.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-1
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/pdf/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-1.pdf
USCOURTS 2:14-cv-00839; Coonrod v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution;
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
Ohio
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-1
1
2016-03-02
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the case in light of the Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 3/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/2/2016. (kpf)
Coonrod v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
OPINION and ORDER adopting 23 the Report and Recommendation and 27 the Supplemental Report and Recommendation; overruling 25 and 28 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 4/5/16. (jk)
2
2016-04-05
D09002ee18f2125d0
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-2
ohsd-2_14-cv-00839_2.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-2
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839/pdf/USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-2.pdf
USCOURTS 2:14-cv-00839; Coonrod v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution;
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
Ohio
USCOURTS-ohsd-2_14-cv-00839-2
2
2016-04-05
OPINION and ORDER adopting 23 the Report and Recommendation and 27 the Supplemental Report and Recommendation; overruling 25 and 28 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 4/5/16. (jk)