Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-776 - Ogle v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-776 - Ogle v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
May 4, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY 8. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/4/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 3, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/1/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 3, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTION FOR STAY OF SENTENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/1/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 14, 2016
PDF | More
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND TO EXPAND THE RECORD - Because Petitioner has not tendered new evidence of the quality required by Schlup, supra, it is inappropriate to grant her an evidentiary hearing or expansion of the record to allow the evidence she has tendered. Her Objections to the Decision and Order should be OVERRULED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/14/2016. (kpf)
July 6, 2016
PDF | More
entiary Hearing and Expansion of the Record 63 are adopted and affirmed. Petitioner's Motions for an Evidentiary Hearing 49 and to Expand the Record 50 are denied. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 07/06/16. (dh1) Modified on 7/11/2016 to change document type (kpf).OPINION AND ORDER overruling Petitioner's objections 54, 60. The Magistrate Judge's Decision and Order 53, Supplemental Opinion on Motions for Evidentiary Hearing and to Expand the Record 57, and Second Supplemental Opinion on Evid
September 7, 2016
PDF | More
***WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO 9/9/2016 NOTATION ORDER*** DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO HOLD IN ABEYANCE re 76. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 09/06/16. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 9/12/2016 (agm).
March 10, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is recommended that Ogle's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealabili on 3/10/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)ty and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 3/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
April 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CORRECT THE RECORD WITHOUT PREJUDICE - Petitioner's Motion to Correct the Record 93 is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal not later than April 17, 2017, if supported by an affidavit of Petitioner stating in as much detail as she can recall (1) the nature and extent of the car trouble and (2) the content of the conversation with Chief Judge Sargus' chambers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/5/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 1, 2017
PDF | More
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the case in light of the Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/1/2o017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 31, 2017
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER adopting and affirming 89 the Magistrate Judge's 03/10/17 Report and Recommendation and 99 the Magistrate Judge's 05/01/17 Supplemental Report and Recommendation on Petitioner's Objections. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation 91 100 are overruled. This action is hereby dismissed. The Court certifies that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and that Petitioner therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 05/31/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)