Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-872 - Harris v. Aramark Incorporation et al

Download Files


Document in Context
17-872 - Harris v. Aramark Incorporation et al
January 11, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 Amended Complaint: It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS all claims for monetary damages against the Individual Defendants in their official capacities and any claims based solely on a Defendant's supervisory capacity. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's negligence claim under state law against the Individual Defendants be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal should the Ohio Court of 8 Claims determine that the state employees are not entitled to immunity under O.R.C. ยง 9.86. Finally, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his remaining claims. Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on January 11, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)