Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

04-033 - Ackerman et al v. Fortis Inc et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
04-033 - Ackerman et al v. Fortis Inc et al
December 13, 2007
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED that the Court impose a penalty of $1,000 upon the Plaintiffs, jointly and severally, to deter repetition of frivolous conduct. If monetary sanctions prove insufficient to deter future repetitions, the Court should consider invoking its power to jail for contempt of court.Objections to R&R due by 1/3/2007. Signed by Judge Michael R Merz on 12/13/07. (dp1 ) Modified on 12/14/2007 to edit text (bev1, ).
January 8, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER STRIKING OBJECTIONS; SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Plaintiffs "Notice Regarding Objection/Precedence" Doc #61 and Amended Notice Regarding Objections/Precedence Doc # 62 are untimely and are ORDERED stricken. IT IS AGAIN RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED the Plaintiffs be fined $1,000, jointly and severally, for their violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Objections to Supplemental R&R due by 1/28/2008. Signed by Judge Michael R Merz on 01/08/2008. (gh1, ) Modified on 1/8/2008 noting Order and NEF mailed via regular US Mail to Pro Se Plaintiffs at the addresses listed on the docket(gh1, ). Modified on 1/9/2008 (gh1, ).
January 29, 2008
PDF | More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING INITIAL 60 (Doc. 114 in 3:00-cv-277) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 63 (Doc. 117 in 3:00-cv-277) OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN THEIR ENTIRETY; MAGISTRATE JUDGES ORDER STRIKING OBJECTIONS AFFIRMED; JUDGMENT TO ENTER AGAINST PLAINTIFFS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FOR THEIR VIOLATION OF FED. R. CIV. P. 11; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 1/29/2008. (sc1, )
September 8, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS - It is therefore respectfully recommended that the Court certify to the Court of Appeals that these appeals are frivolous and not taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 9/25/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/6/2008. (kopf1, )
September 30, 2008
PDF | More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 129 IN CASE NO. 3:00-cv-00277-WHR-MRM); DOC. 75 IN CASE NO. 3:04-cv-00033-WHR-MRM) DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS; OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILINGS (DOC. 130 IN CASE NO. 3:00-cv-00277-WHR-MRM); DOC. 76 IN CASE NO. 3:04-cv-00033-WHR-MRM) OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/30/2008. (sc1, )
October 28, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Because, as this Court has repeatedly held and the Sixth Circuit has determined, all of Plaintiffs' claims have long since been decided against them and are now res judicata, any further appeal would be frivolous and leave to pursue that appeal in forma pauperis should be denied. Objections to R&R due by 11/17/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/27/2008. (kopf1, )
October 29, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is recommended that because the Amended Motions add nothing of substance to the original Motions, they should also be denied. Objections to R&R due by 11/17/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/29/2008. (kopf1, )
November 20, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation 81 and denies 79 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Walter H Rice on 11/20/2008. (kopf1, )