United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2015-05-11
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2008-09-29
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194
P0b002ee18c3897a9
DGPO
2015-05-11
2015-05-11
USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194
District
ohsd
6th
Ohio
2393
3:08-cv-00194
Dayton
civil
440
Other Civil Rights
28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ealy v. Foster et al
3:08-cv-00194
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194
JU 4.15
3:08-cv-00194;08-194
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
6th Circuit
Dayton
U.S. Courts
author
aut
Mary E Donvan
Donvan
Mary
Defendant
Larry E. Ealy r
Ealy
Larry
r
Plaintiff
Paul Foster
Foster
Paul
Defendant
George M Glasser
Glasser
George
Defendant
Thomas J Grady
Grady
Thomas
Defendant
John Kessler
Kessler
John
Defendant
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194
District
ohsd
6th
Ohio
2393
3:08-cv-00194
Dayton
civil
440
Other Civil Rights
28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ohio
Ealy v. Foster et al
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Larry E. Ealys Complaint (Doc. #1) be DISMISSED; 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied. If so certified, Plaintiff a nonprisoner would remain free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999); and, 3. The case be terminated on the docket of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 7/28/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 07/11/08. (phil1, )
0
2008-07-11
D09002ee18c50bcf7
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-0
ohsd-3_08-cv-00194_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194/pdf/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-0.pdf
USCOURTS 3:08-cv-00194; Ealy v. Foster et al;
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
Ohio
USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-0
0
2008-07-11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Larry E. Ealys Complaint (Doc. #1) be DISMISSED; 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied. If so certified, Plaintiff a nonprisoner would remain free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999); and, 3. The case be terminated on the docket of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 7/28/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 07/11/08. (phil1, )
Ealy v. Foster et al
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 3) IN THEIR ENTIRETY, AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. 4); JUDGMENT TO ENTER, DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED; ANTICIPATED REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATIONENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/29/2008. (jdf1)
1
2008-09-29
D09002ee18c50bcf8
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-1
ohsd-3_08-cv-00194_1.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-1
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194/pdf/USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-1.pdf
USCOURTS 3:08-cv-00194; Ealy v. Foster et al;
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio
Ohio
USCOURTS-ohsd-3_08-cv-00194-1
1
2008-09-29
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 3) IN THEIR ENTIRETY, AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. 4); JUDGMENT TO ENTER, DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED; ANTICIPATED REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATIONENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/29/2008. (jdf1)