Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-155 - Stolle Machinery Company v. RAM Precision Industries et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-155 - Stolle Machinery Company v. RAM Precision Industries et al
March 30, 2011
PDF | More
OPINION SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND FOR FAILURE OF COMPLAINT TO STATE CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED (DOC.14); EXPANDED OPINION TO BE FILED WITHIN STATED PERIOD OF TIME. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 03/30/2011. (kf)
October 5, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY- The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 10/5/16. (kma)