Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-369 - Parillo et al v. New Werner Co. et a.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-369 - Parillo et al v. New Werner Co. et a.
December 4, 2014
PDF | More
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING THE PARILLOS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 9). There is no evidence that Defendants failed to attach all copies of all process, pleadings and orders served upon Defendants as required by the removal statute. If there was a procedural failure, and the Court has not identified one, Defendants could correct it. Plaintiff's argument regarding unanimity of consent cannot be considered, but, if it were, it is without merit because there is unanimity of consent and Defendants were not required to allege unanimity of consent in its removal Notice. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/4/14. (ep)
July 28, 2015
PDF | More
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 33 AND DISMISSING COUNTS 1, 2, 6, AND 7 OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 31. Accordingly, Counts 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the Third Amended Complaint 31 are dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7-28-2015. (de)
February 24, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying 47 Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of Subject Ladder. Signed by Magistrate Chief Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/24/16. (mcm) Modified on 2/24/2016 (mcm).
January 19, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 59 Motion for Summary Judgment as moot and granting 63 Joint Motion to Drop Parties. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1-19-2017. (de)
September 7, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY AND ORDER TERMINATING MOTIONS IN LIMINE [76,78,79] RE: EXPERT WITNESSES, PREJUDICIAL TESTIMONY AND DAMAGES REPORT; GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE 77RE: WERNER CO.'S BANKRUPTCY; AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION IN LIMINE 83 RE: LAY OPINION TESTIMONY. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to respond to that Motion in Limine 83 by September 11, 2017. Lowe's may file a reply in support of the Motion in Limine by September 13, 2017. If the Court deems oral argument necessary, it will hear the matter before the commencement of trial onSeptember 18, 2017. In light of the above rulings, the Court will not proceed with the hearing that was tentatively scheduled for September 11, 2017. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-7-2017. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (de)
September 18, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE 87 TO RESPOND INSTANTER TO DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF AND GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE 83 TO EXCLUDE LAY WITNESS OPINION TESTIMONY REGARDING MEDICAL CAUSATION AND DIAGNOSIS. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-18-2017. (de)
September 19, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS IN LIMINE REGARDING EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DR. JERNER AND DR. BURKE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-19-2017. (de)