Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-454 - Sherrod et al v. Williams et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-454 - Sherrod et al v. Williams et al
September 24, 2015
PDF | More
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 25. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 9/24/2015. (srb)
December 31, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A STAY (DOC. 34); (2) STAYING THE DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS WILLIAMS AND DARKOW FOR NINETY (90) DAYS; AND (3) SETTING A STATUS CONFERENCE WITH THE UNDERSIGNED ON MARCH 28, 2016 AT 2:30 P.M. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 12/31/2015. (srb)
January 26, 2016
PDF | More
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 1/26/2016. (srb)
August 10, 2016
PDF | More
garding a new discovery plan and Calendar Order. If necessary and agreeable, the parties shall file a joint motion with the Courtseeking to amend the current Calendar Order in its entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/10/2016. (dm)ORDER - With regard to the stay of discovery -- which was set to expire on or about August 7,2016, the Court hereby ORDERS, nunc pro tunc, that said stay shall continue until further order of the Court. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer re
August 15, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - The Court, acting sua sponte, VACATES its August 10, 2016 Order with respect to the stay of these two depositions; the Order, in all other respects, remains in full force and effect. At the request of Judge Rice, the stay is CONTINUED FOR 45 DAYS from the issuance of this Order, or until the Court orders to the contrary, whichever occurs first. The issue of the deposition stay is referred back to Judge Rice. All other discovery issues shall remain with the undersigned. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/15/2016. (srb)
February 6, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS WAL-MART STORES, INC. AND WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. #70) AND PLAINTIFFS TRESSA SHERROD, JOHN CRAWFORD, JR., JHC IV AND JC'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. #88); PLAINTIFFS AND WAL-MART SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SCHEDULE SET FORTH BELOW; COURT WILL ISSUE MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDERS NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 10, 2017. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 2/6/17. (pb)
May 11, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY MEMORIALIZING MAY 5, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL; SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT WAL-MART STORES EAST L.P.'S SEALED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND A PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. # 92); OVERRULING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO WAL-MART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. # 94) - Finally, in order to accommodate Plaintiffs' need to replace one of its expert witnesses, and their need to then take the 30(b)(6) deposition of Wal-Mart's designee, the parties agreed to submit a proposed Modified Scheduling Order. Said proposed Order shall be filed no later than May 23, 2017. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/10/2017. (srb)
June 19, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT WAL-MART'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL granting 100 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/19/17. (pb)
June 26, 2017
PDF | More
ENRY SETTINGTELEPHONIC CONFERENCE FOR PLAINTIFFS TRESSA SHERROD, JOHN CRAWFORD, JR., JHC IV AND JC, AND DEFENDANTS WAL-MART STORES, INC., AND WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P, ON JULY 7, 2017, AT 5:00 P.M.; WAL-MART SHALL RESPOND TO OUTSTANDING INTERROGATORY AN DREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PROPOUNDED BY PLAINTIFFS; COURT SHALL RULE ON ANY UNRESOLVED DISPUTES OVER PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REUESTS AND RULE 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION NOTICE TO WAL-MART -After consideration of the parties' statements and all relevant legal and equitable considerations, the Court orders the following: 1. A telephonic conference is set for July 7, 2017, at 5:00 p.m., to issue rulings on any outstanding discovery disputes between Plaintiffs and Wal-Mart. 2. Wal-Mart shall respond to Revised Interrogatory No. 12 and produce relevant, responsive and non-privileged documents in response to Revised Request for Document Production No. 2 as soon as a meaningful response is possible, and no later than Monday, July 3, 2017. 3. After Wal-Mart submits the above-mentioned discovery responses, counsel for Wal-Mart and Plaintiffs shall confer to determine whether there are any disputes over Wal-Mart's responses, and attempt to resolve those disputes. 4. Counsel for Wal-Mart and Plaintiffs shall also confer regarding Wal-Mart's objections to Plaintiffs' Revised Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice to Wal-Mart, and attempt to resolve those objections. 5. At least twenty-four hours prior to the July 7, 2017, conference call, the parties shall submit a stipulation to the Court of issues upon which they need the Court to rule. Such issues may include but are not limited to: a. The sufficiency of Wal-Mart's responses to Revised Interrogatory No. 12 and Revised Request for Document Production No. 2; b. Whether Wal-Mart's responses to Plaintiffs' discovery requests renders moot Topics Four through Ten in Plaintiffs' Revised Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice; and c. Whether any unresolved disputes still exist between the parties Date: June 26, 2017 regarding Wal-Mart's objections to Topics One, Two, Three and Eleven in Plaintiffs' Revised Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/26/2017. (srb)