Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-310 - Waller vs. Warden Terry Tibbals


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-310 - Waller vs. Warden Terry Tibbals
December 3, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY - Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance (ECF No. 10) is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal upon a showing of what claims Petitioner intends to exhaust and what state remedies he intends to pursue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/3/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 16, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR STAY 13. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/16/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 19, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted toproceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/5/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/19/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 19, 2016
PDF | More
ty and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/16/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealabili
January 19, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS 25 32 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENTATIONS 22 AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 DENYING PLAINTIFF'S GROUNDS FOR RELIEF AND DISMISSING PETITIONER'S PETITION, DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUESTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ON BOTH GROUNDS, TERMINATING SAID CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1-19-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)