Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-118 - Fisk v. Dayton Police Department et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-118 - Fisk v. Dayton Police Department et al
June 24, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's claims against the Dayton Police Department, the Dayton Municipal Court, and Magistrate Moorman be DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiff's excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment against Defendants Officers Wombold and Cartte not be dismissed; and the United States Marshal's Office be ORDERED to effect service upon Defendants Wombold and Cartte, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), once it receives the required forms from the Clerk of Court. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Objections to R&R due by 7/11/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6-24-16. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 13, 2016
PDF | More
[**VACATED pursuant to Decision and Entry filed on 8/24/2016**]DECISON AND ENTRY ADOPTING the Report and Recommendations 3 in full; Plaintiff's claims against the Dayton Police Department, the Dayton Municipal Court, and Magistrate Moorman are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง1915(e)(2), Plaintiff's excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment against Defendants Officers Wombold and Cartte are not dismissed, and the United States Marshal's Office are ORDERED to effect service upon Defendants Wombold and Cartte, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), once it receives the required forms from the Clerk of Court. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7-13-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 8/24/2016 (de).
August 24, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ENTRY VACATING ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 4, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATESCHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON 3, AND OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 5. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-24-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 19, 2017
PDF | More
y regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)ORDER granting 14 Motion to Compel - Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSEon or before June 2, 2017why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 5/19/17. (pb)(This document has been sent b
June 6, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) 21 Defendants' request for an Order dismissing this case be GRANTED; and 2) The case be terminated on the Court's docket. Objections to R&R due by 6/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6-6-17. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations docketed on June 6, 2017 22 is ADOPTED in full, Defendants' request for an Order dismissing this case [#21] is GRANTED; and the case is terminated on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-30-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)